We tracked gross sales and sentiment for the launch of the RX 9070 XT and made the map above. In inexperienced, you possibly can see areas of utmost buyer satisfaction with AMD. Major cities within the US did fairly nicely. Far higher than NVIDIA.
Now let’s have a look at the dissatisfied areas:

OK, so it wasn’t the smoothest launch for AMD. And as a result of we didn’t embark on a 5-hour round-trip highway journey, we obtained to expertise web buying first-hand. We purchase most of our accomplice fashions to overview quite than request them lately, and that meant we obtained to expertise the absurd actuality of all of it.
At first, it appeared to go nicely: We thought we’d gotten a number of orders by means of at Newegg at 9:08 AM, 8 minutes after launch, and once more at 9:28 AM Eastern, which meant we had been late as much as half-hour and nonetheless noticed seemingly tons of choices in inventory.
But then we acquired these messages from Newegg canceling our orders, and it seems, so did actually a whole bunch of different folks.
When we tried to purchase GPUs at MSRP from Amazon, we had been met with this:
We did the one rational factor that well-adjusted adults would do: We spent two days obsessively gathering details about costs of GPUs for taking part in video video games.
Only 12 of 51 fashions that we catalogued throughout 4 retailers had been at MSRP within the US. Of the remaining 39, 5 had been 42% over MSRP and 16 had been 30-40% over MSRP, which is worse than we’ve seen in most prior GPU launches, aside from the 50-series.
In some methods, it’s a “normal” launch: There are all the time fashions over MSRP. That’s regular. But it felt dangerous this time due to simply what number of had been to date over MSRP. But the excellent news is that it wasn’t a paper launch: More like a extremely compressed cellulose arboreal composite launch…
But Micro Center enjoyers had a special expertise:

We seen {that a} Micro Center had 45% of its whole stock at MSRP.
And that looks like a a lot better distribution of MSRP playing cards than what was skilled by these of you who dwell in a small place allegedly known as “the rest of the world.” We’re informed it’s a pleasant place to trip.
Today, we’re digging by means of the proof we’ve collected to higher perceive the AMD RX 9070 (learn our overview) launch and put some context to the absurdity.
“Fake MSRP” & Price Tracking
We ready this desk of RX 9070 XT (learn our overview) costs by means of a mixture of information from TrackaLacker and a few guide knowledge assortment. It reveals the cardboard mannequin, retailer, unique and up to date value (if relevant), how a lot the value modified, and the way a lot the value is elevated over the bottom MSRP of $600. Because of the way in which Amazon aggressively de-lists and removes costs, something from Amazon is simply what we got here throughout in a spot test on the morning of launch. Pricing knowledge could change by the point we publish because of a fluid market.
The common value of all 9070 XT fashions, ignoring amount, is $739, or $139 increased than AMD’s base $600 MSRP. With all playing cards included, that makes the typical enhance over MSRP 23% by mannequin – with non-MSRP occupying a variety from 20% over to a very dangerous 42% over, which is totally insane. Please don’t spend that rather more for considered one of these playing cards. Only 12 of the 51 listings we cataloged had been truly at MSRP.
XFX’s Mercury 9070 XTs had been the worst, with the Magnetic Air OC variant taking the highest spots together with the PowerColor Red Devil Limited Edition at Micro Center. Expressed as a median, XFX’s 9070 XT fashions all mixed had been 29% over MSRP. The ASUS TUF playing cards fill in subsequent at 33% over MSRP. ASRock usually stayed the closest to MSRP, with its playing cards coming to a median of 11% over MSRP.
Interestingly, Best Buy and B&H present value reductions throughout just a few listings – all of which had extraordinarily elevated preliminary costs. The worst was the ASUS TUF at B&H for $1,100, later lowered to $800. B&H may be capable to argue these had been placeholder costs because it’s solely promoting these GPUs through ready checklist, however we are able to’t make certain.

Best Buy’s scenario was related, with an preliminary itemizing value of $950 for the Gigabyte AORUS ELITE, which later dropped to $760. This could coincide with the lime-limited “deal” pricing we noticed from Best Buy initially on launch morning, whose “deal” textual content was later eliminated. Our understanding is that AMD had a dialog with Best Buy after seeing this, inflicting the retailer to take away what appeared to insinuate that the launch value was a restricted time and that it’d climb later.
RX 9070 Price Table
Now we’ll transfer on to the RX 9070 non-XTs. MSRP is meant to be $550 for these, which we keep is $50 too excessive and deliberately creates an upsell.
The excellent news is that it’s not $550. The dangerous information is that it’s extra.

The common value of all listings is $628, which is $78 increased than the bottom MSRP of $550, or a median of 14% over. 13 of the 38 playing cards we gathered data on had been at that base MSRP – a greater ratio than the XTs. The common enhance over MSRP for all 9070s proven right here is 14%, with the raised value fashions in a variety from 13% on the low-end for the PowerColor Hellhound at Micro Center, as much as the Sapphire NITRO+ at a 31% enhance over base value, which was additionally at Micro Center.
That places the most costly 9070 we discovered at $720, which is clearly atrociously dangerous. Nobody ought to pay even near that for considered one of these playing cards.

It’s truly the identical value because the ASUS 9070 XT Prime OC at Newegg. At these costs, you’d be higher off shopping for a used NVIDIA GPU on eBay at these costs.

In truth, each single 9070 that wasn’t MSRP was truly dearer than MSRP 9070 XTs. That’s additionally insane, and could be one other piece of proof pointing to AMD dropping the MSRP of each of those GPUs on the final second.
Average enhance per board accomplice is loads nearer for the non-XTs by proportion, to the purpose that it’s not worthwhile to get into the particular numbers. ASUS was technically the worst.
Overall, including all of the 9070 XTs and 9070s collectively, the typical p.c enhance over MSRP is nineteen%. We don’t know whether or not that’s regular or not for AMD since that is the primary time we’ve gathered that knowledge for AMD, however we’ll carry up a degree from our NVIDIA “Fake Prices” piece.

The ASUS RTX 4090 Strix – considered the most costly “normal” 4090 – offered for 25% over MSRP. That’s a high-end GPU with a bunch of pointless, costly bells-and-whistles from an organization that largely sells its model picture. Tons of those AMD 9070 XTs (and a few non-XT) are means throughout that proportion threshold, once more together with some at 42% over MSRP. That’s an even bigger value hike than the Strix 4090.
In this case, trendy midrange GPU value bloat continues, even when it’s not as excessive as NVIDIA’s 5070 Ti class of GPUs.
According to this detailed product itemizing sheet from the Dallas Microcenter, which is the one such one we had been capable of finding, we noticed 421 out of 920 playing cards, or roughly 46%, had been offered at MSRP. More particularly, 319 of the 705 9070 XTs and 102 out of 215 9070s had been listed with MSRP. This accounts for about 45.25% of 9070 XTs and almost 47.5% for the non-XTs.
As seen on this chart we put collectively, every producer listed had at the very least one MSRP card for each variants of the GPU. In these listings, excluding MSRP fashions, p.c over MSRP ranged from 12.73% on the low finish to 41.67% on the excessive finish.
It’s regular for AIB companions to cost greater than baseline MSRP. They tack-on additional options, they’ve high quality of life choices like additional VBIOS, “hellstones,” apparently, and quieter cooling.
What isn’t regular is the quantity of upcharge we’re seeing this technology for each NVIDIA and AMD. Both firms’ companions have completely misplaced the plot, however AMD’s particularly feels dangerous as a result of it marketed itself because the savior of gaming at reasonably priced costs.

We dug again by means of decade-old opinions from our personal publication, TechPowerUp, Tom’s Hardware, Anandtech, and others. We took costs from launch day of the GTX 1080 Ti and RX 5700 XT (learn our overview) GPUs to check their common value will increase over baseline MSRP. Remember: There are a number of MSRPs. There’s the bottom value from AMD or NVIDIA, however then the MSRP for every particular person mannequin. What we’re proving is that the associated fee enhance in accomplice MSRP over baseline has gotten means worse.

Here’s the GOATed GTX 1080 Ti. We reviewed a variety of these. As you keep in mind, the 9070 XT had a number of playing cards at 42% over MSRP. The GTX 1080 Ti KINGPIN was the one card at 42% over MSRP, technically about 43%, and that’s a specialised XOC card. Those are mainly extinct in the present day. Cards of that high quality don’t exist anymore.
The subsequent highest is the Lightning Z, which was a competing card to the KP and was 24% over MSRP. In truth, a lot of the playing cards of that period had been about 7% to 10% over MSRP, together with a few of the finest ones. The EVGA 1080 Ti FTW3 (watch our overview) and SC2 (watch our overview) had been each wonderful playing cards. The 1080 Ti Armor (watch our overview) was a fundamental 1080 Ti for MSRP, however might be transformed into a superb water-cooled card with its reference PCB.
This chart is massively completely different from what we simply noticed within the 9070 and 50-series launches. Partners have gotten uncontrolled.

Here’s the 5700 XT. The 5700 XT had two costs. The first was $450, however after it jebaited itself, it got here right down to $400 pre-launch. Using the $400 value because the reference since that was launch pricing, the uplift for the playing cards we discovered through TechPowerUp and our personal prior GN opinions ranged from 3% to twenty% elevated over MSRP. The $480 Taichi OC+ was among the many highest.
There are fashions we didn’t checklist for every, however this cross-section offers you playing cards from throughout every stack.
We are assured that knowledge helps the delta towards MSRP rising with time. That means AMD and NVIDIA share blame with the companions for setting presumably unrealistic targets.
Tracking Stock

We’ll come again to the pretend MSRP dialogue in a minute. First, it’d assist to have perspective on quantity and if this was a “paper launch” like NVIDIA’s.
Micro Center might be form of a microcosm for our stock report: It’s only one chain and it’s hyper localized, however as a result of we have now knowledge for its RTX 50 launch, we are able to extra simply get a like-for-like comparability perspective on AMD’s.

By crawling by means of net posts and cross-referencing them, we had been in a position to conclude that Micro Center had almost 12,000 identified playing cards in inventory (excluding just a few shops we couldn’t discover knowledge for).
For reference, this spreadsheet circulated on Reddit after customers tallied the Micro Center inventories for the 50-series launch day. The Madison Heights and Sterling Heights shops are literally the identical, so subtracting these 10 duplicate entry models from the 5090s and 91 models from the 5080s (learn our overview), we find yourself with 223x RTX 5090s and a couple of,302 RTX 5080s for launch day.
Overclockers UK additionally posted some numbers. Gibbo from OC UK posted this:

“We do have several deliveries due today and next week, so we might have more available later. We have sold around 5000 units now, warehouse is working very hard to get them all shipped out today.”
That places us at 12,000 models for a localized retailer within the US and 5,000 models for a UK-based retailer. Speaking with somebody at AMD off-record, GN discovered that AMD and its companions shipped “tens of thousands” of models to the North American market alone, with most of these being 9070 XT GPUs.

The break-out is extra attention-grabbing: We don’t have the break-out for every retailer of the 9070 vs. 9070 XT portions, however of the 11,657 whole tallied, we had been in a position to determine the mannequin of two,528 of them. The cut up of those is about 22% 9070 non-XT to 78% 9070 XT.
The RX 9070 is a Decoy Product
We assume this helps the speculation that AMD doesn’t truly need to promote the RX 9070 GPUs. We assume that’s a mannequin designed to create an upsell to the 9070 XT, like a decoy product.
AMD did this with the 7900 XT and 7900 XTX (at $900 and $1000), with that distinction simply months later turning into about $200. Within a 12 months, the distinction was at occasions $250.
To us, it doesn’t matter why AMD does this. We don’t care about AMD’s perspective. All we care about is the buyer perspective. And for the buyer, the rationale an organization may upsell them is irrelevant — all they know is that they’re getting upsold. Maybe the yields are so good on the XT that they should fuse merchandise off to even create a non-XT. But if that’s the argument, then they could as nicely drop the value for the goodwill and value accessibility since there aren’t that many anyway — however then the 9070 wouldn’t serve what we assume is its function, which is to purely perform as a device to create an upsell to a 9070 XT.
System Integrator Inventory
We subsequent checked with a number of system integrators we all know. They have a really completely different perspective on the success of AMD’s launch than retailers for DIY.

The first SI we spoke to offered 50 methods with 9070 XTs and 20 methods with 9070s on launch day. That SI had simply over 1,000 methods with RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT playing cards obtainable for buy. That’s about 7% of the constructed methods that had been offered on launch day. The SI informed us that this was “better than expected” as in comparison with AMD’s earlier launches.
For perspective, that very same SI beforehand informed us that they’d 20 models of RTX 5090 GPU (learn our overview) on launch day and that they offered out in about 2-4 minutes. There could also be some affect from the broader market there: As customers couldn’t purchase retail DIY playing cards, they might have resorted to pre-built machines.
Another SI informed us that they offered 7 models of 100 obtainable on launch day. Interestingly, that’s additionally 7% — in order that’s two very in a different way sized system integrators on the identical sell-through of stock. The second SI offered about 30 models of RTX 5090 methods on launch day, which was 100% of availability.
It was attention-grabbing to realize the angle of those firms. For the primary, it was a greater launch than anticipated — however solely within the context of AMD. For the second, the launch was seen nearly as a dud. In each conditions, the typical non-enthusiast “video game enjoyer” doesn’t purchase AMD, at the very least in pre-built PCs.
AMD has to make inroads there ultimately. For it to do this, it wants unshakeable goodwill within the fanatic DIY phase in order that these folks change into their evangelists.
Between the 2 SIs we spoke with, one acquired 50.5x extra AMD GPUs than it acquired NVIDIA playing cards on day one, but it made much less income from them. The different acquired about 100x extra since they’d solely acquired a single 5090 initially, although they obtained one other 20 or so on launch day, in order that’d nonetheless put it at 5x extra.
Using Micro Center solely as one other management, they acquired 4 occasions as many RX 9000 sequence playing cards as RTX 5000 sequence playing cards.
By all accounts, this isn’t a “paper launch” in the way in which the RTX 5000 sequence was. This seems to be extra regular, in that there was a very good quantity of provide, simply not sufficient to fulfill preliminary demand.
So the availability wasn’t pretend. Now we query whether or not the “MSRP” is pretend.
Retailers Claiming “Temporary Price”
Since plainly AMD panicked when it caught wind of NVIDIA’s January bulletins, we are able to proceed the hypothesis that it by no means deliberate to promote the playing cards at these costs. If AMD is subsidizing companions, distributors, and retailers to hit the lower-than-expected value, then the brand new concern turns into whether or not the introduced value is “temporary.”
Found through VideoCardz, at the very least three distributors have publicly acknowledged that MSRP will solely apply to the primary cargo of playing cards.
Swedish retailer Inet.se introduced in a machine translated submit:
“Prices apply only to the first delivery of the respective model. We have now been told how the recommended prices, so-called MSRP prices, work for the launch of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT. We must not say exact prices for the release, but simply explaining they will apply to a limited number of cards.”
The firm clarified (which has additionally been machine translated):
“Our second delivery from PowerColor is already waiting, and we can not offer it at MSRP prices. This means that we will first sell the Reaper models at MSRP price and the stock balance will tick down as usual until the first delivery is sold out. Then, with a certain delay, the stock will be filled with new cards and we will then release the Reaper cards for order again – but then not at MSRP price.
“If you get through an order with MSRP price even if the cards are sold out, we will of course give you that price, but we unfortunately have no opportunities to continue selling cards at MSRP price after the first deliveries are sold out.”
Retailer OCUK, which is a part of the CaseKing household, affirmed this in its discussion board submit:

“MSRP is capped quantity of a few hundred, so prices will jump once those are sold through.”
Another UK retailer, eBuyer, reportedly cancelled pre-orders that had been processed at MSRP after it offered out of the primary supply of playing cards. They defined to an affected buyer:

“Unfortunately, we were only allocated a limited number of units at the price offered by AMD, and we won’t be receiving any additional stock at this price. As you can imagine, this launch has been extremely popular, and we have now sold out at that price. As a result of this, your pre order has been cancelled, and any payments have been reversed.”

A separate eBuyer buyer claimed he checked out at £569.99 however the value elevated to £664.98 when processing his fee.

eBuyer repeated its earlier assertion explaining the finite variety of MSRP playing cards and added, “once these were sold we did have to sell these are normal cost [sic].” This would appear to point that it’s not merely from taxes being added after the very fact.

But AMD has responded. AMD emailed us a press release from Frank Azor, whom you might keep in mind from a earlier AMD launch the place he guess clients that, not like its competitors, he’d have inventory at launch. He guess $10. He misplaced the guess. We’re unsure if he ever paid it out.

Just like when AMD’s different now-former government claimed — we expect lied — about AMD dropping GPU costs after panicking at NVIDIA’s launch as some form of 6D chess grand jebaiting technique, AMD has frequently used NVIDIA and riled-up a tribal mentality as a protect for its personal incompetence.
Emailed to us, Frank Azor mentioned this:
“It is inaccurate that $549/$599 MSRP is launch-only pricing. We expect cards to be available from multiple vendors at $549/$599 (excluding region specific tariffs and/or taxes) based on the work we have done with our AIB partners, and more are coming. At the same time, the AIBs have different premium configurations at higher price points and those will also continue.”
Speaking with insiders, we discovered that AMD is “enabling” companions to proceed this pricing. When we requested what “enabling” means right here, we had been informed that AMD is working to decrease price to companions both by means of direct value reductions or by means of rebates and advertising and marketing improvement fund, or MDF. MDF is cash that companions can use to spend on AMD-approved promoting efforts. If you see adverts pop-up on YouTube for AMD’s GPU companions sooner or later, it’s possible that cash went from AMD itself and thru the accomplice to commerce for synthetic suppression of the GPU value.
But based mostly on the assertion they despatched to the media, it’s nonetheless unclear whether or not playing cards for MSRP might be anticipated or not going ahead. The statements from distributors and AMD straight contradict each other. AMD can definitely say “launch-only pricing” is inaccurate, however the truth of the matter is the sellers beforehand talked about have elevated costs.
If AMD actually wished to implement its MSRP, it might technically not distribute to retailers who don’t honor the value, however that appears unlikely. It doesn’t matter how a lot AMD claims pricing wasn’t launch-only: By not providing its personal reference mannequin on the market as NVIDIA does, it’s an confederate to the homicide of its launch value. It has allowed companions to float from the baseline as a result of they’re all doing it, and with out AMD there to undercut them, there’s no anchor to carry it again down. There are execs and cons to this: On the upside, AMD can keep away from an EVGA departure scenario. On the draw back, companions can run wild, and AMD completely shares a few of that blame. If AMD doesn’t management the ultimate value as a result of it doesn’t promote the ultimate product, it will possibly’t actually assure the value it marketed.
For all of the sh*t NVIDIA will get, it does have this facet of issues collectively. It is controlling, overbearing, and levers its place to implement strict necessities. Even if that’s usually a nasty factor, it will possibly additionally work in favor of shoppers.
Non-US Market Gets Screwed
We’re based mostly within the US and are most aware of that market, in order that’s what we’ve checked out to date. But from studying feedback from viewers internationally, it’s change into clear that you simply all obtained screwed essentially the most.
We’ve collected stories from 16 completely different international locations exterior of the US, all sharing an analogous sentiment of MSRP playing cards evaporating in seconds to minutes.
A consumer from Europe reported, “In Europe the ‘MSRP’ cards were all gone within two minutes at most.”
One from Australia says, “By the time the page loaded, it was out of stock.”
Another EU resident expresses, “Gone within 5 minutes.”
A Polish consumer describes, “Not a single card was MSRP.” And the checklist goes on.
Various customers reported Netherlands retailer Megekko constantly elevated costs all through the launch.
One consumer explains, “At 15.00 their website crashed, and megekko kept on raising the prices, if im correct they raised the price 3 times in total. Now it costs 1100euro for a 9070xt that has 600dollar msrp.”
Another states, “Bought one from megekko for 930€ and was ‘sold out’ 3 seconds later, only to come back fully in stock but suddenly ANOTHER 100€ added.”
A 3rd consumer provides that the retailer even elevated 7900 XTX pricing.
Because we don’t have precise numbers right here, we are able to’t make any definitive claims. That being mentioned, these stories appear to recommend that non-US distributors, excluding OCUK, didn’t obtain as a lot inventory as these within the US did. Specifically, inventory being offered at MSRP. Interestingly, that is with new tariffs within the US.
Conclusion

Based on our analysis, it does seem as if the associated fee enhance in accomplice fashions has elevated over time. Partners are delivery playing cards at a p.c value increased than baseline MSRP that’s higher than what they’ve achieved traditionally up to now from what we’ve briefly checked out so far.
This may point out that launch MSRPs could be for present. We assume the scenario boils right down to greed. If we’re being charitable to companions in that they’re elevating costs simply to outlive the low margins, then the MSRPs are bull****.
When we lined EVGA’s GPUs, we discovered that the corporate was simply making $4 per card, so their margin was functionally zero. When NVIDIA let off the stress to hit sure baseline costs, EVGA would cease promoting these lower-margin playing cards to push pricier fashions that yielded increased margins. This is one thing we are able to’t fault them for given the low margin they needed to take care of.

The pricing scenario appears to have gotten worse. The argument that the tariffs are behind that is sort of BS as a result of different international locations exterior of the US are getting screwed much more. In addition, these playing cards have been stockpiled within the US earlier than the tariffs went into impact. Tariffs will have an impact, however we don’t purchase it once you have a look at the whole scenario throughout each AMD and NVIDIA during the last 2 launches. We’re seeing a value creep because of firms realizing they’ll make more cash on video playing cards, particularly since they notice folks can pay for it. The finish result’s that individuals get screwed. The delta towards baseline MSRP is widening.